找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 1091|回复: 1

Anti-Tibetan independence

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-4-28 13:21:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Anti-Tibetan independence
The recent riots in Lhasa in a few Tibetan communities in Gansu and Sichuan provinces have been turned by some foreign media, and political figures into an issue of “human rights, without democracy ”.Being Chinese people ,they are angry ,you are angry ,we are all angry .how can they criticize us like this ,why !for what ?
“You know nothing about our history , know nothing about our culture ,you even don’t know the whole process of the secessionist activities .how can you just quote a remark out of its context without any sense of justice ,distort our meanings ,undermine our images ? I can not help asking you: what’s your motive?
“Tibetan issue is our domestic affairs .it is not an issue of human rights. You should all obey the international rules of noninterference in other’s internal affairs. Before you criticize us ignorantly, groundlessly .you should at least know your own history.
Listen clearly: In the 1960s and 1970s, there are violent riots in US inner city areas of Chicago, Detroit, and Los Angeles by some African-American people .These riots-like those in Tibet. The US government used police and military forces, including armored personnel carriers, to occupy the streets of the riot-torn areas in order to rest or order and ensure the safety of the life and property .But it was never suggested that ending such riots constituted: “repression of human rights” or a “harsh crackdown”. Similarly, when Nicholas Sarkozy was interior minister of France a few years ago ,he oversaw massive use of police and military forces to quell extremely violent riots by Muslim French youths protesting against economic and other forms of discrimination Sarkozy felt fully justified in the use of force ,and no western media or political figure suggested it was a “horrible human rights violation” .So it is curious that his current role as president of France he had quickly condemned China’s use of precisely the same but milder means to protect its citizens in Tibet .The similar examples are too numerous to mention. Our Chinese government’s restrained use of riot police to stop the recent violence is far milder than measures taken under similar circumstances by other governments.
“Noninterference in our internal affairs.”
发表于 2008-5-11 23:39:30 | 显示全部楼层
well citing of the historical truths to convince your audience that those countries are misusing their right of free speech.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|译路同行

GMT+8, 2025-4-5 23:30 , Processed in 0.050421 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表